New Orleans
4 Sep 2005 11:15 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yelling at the President now will not speed up the recovery efforts, so I'm putting this behind an LJ cut. It's allegations that will need to be addressed later, though.
Senator Mary Landrieu (Louisiana), in a press release dated 03 Sept:
And, something that needs to be verified:
EDIT: The ZDF story was apparently a combination of two stories, mixed in translation. The first was President Bush visiting a food distribution point in New Orleans, the second report reported (in translation) "But what has happened in Biloxi all day long is truly unbelievable. Suddenly recovery units appeared, suddenly bulldozers were there, those hadn't been seen here all the days before, and this in an area, in which it really wouldn't be necessary to do a big clean up, because far and wide nobody lives here anymore, the people are more inland in the city. The President travels with a press baggage [big crew]. This press baggage got very beautiful pictures which are supposed to say, that the President was here and help is on the way, too." Details can be read at respectful of otters and War and Peace.
Senator Mary Landrieu (Louisiana), in a press release dated 03 Sept:
But perhaps the greatest disappointment stands at the breached 17th Street levee. Touring this critical site yesterday with the President, I saw what I believed to be a real and significant effort to get a handle on a major cause of this catastrophe. Flying over this critical spot again this morning, less than 24 hours later, it became apparent that yesterday we witnessed a hastily prepared stage set for a Presidential photo opportunity; and the desperately needed resources we saw were this morning reduced to a single, lonely piece of equipment.
And, something that needs to be verified:
There was a striking dicrepancy between the CNN International report on the Bush visit to the New Orleans disaster zone, yesterday, and reports of the same event by German TV.
ZDF News reported that the president's visit was a completely staged event. Their crew witnessed how the open air food distribution point Bush visited in front of the cameras was torn down immediately after the president and the herd of 'news people' had left and that others which were allegedly being set up were abandoned at the same time.
The people in the area were once again left to fend for themselves, said ZDF.
EDIT: The ZDF story was apparently a combination of two stories, mixed in translation. The first was President Bush visiting a food distribution point in New Orleans, the second report reported (in translation) "But what has happened in Biloxi all day long is truly unbelievable. Suddenly recovery units appeared, suddenly bulldozers were there, those hadn't been seen here all the days before, and this in an area, in which it really wouldn't be necessary to do a big clean up, because far and wide nobody lives here anymore, the people are more inland in the city. The President travels with a press baggage [big crew]. This press baggage got very beautiful pictures which are supposed to say, that the President was here and help is on the way, too." Details can be read at respectful of otters and War and Peace.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-04 11:27 am (UTC)If they don't agree with CNN, then I'd definitely be more inclined to trust the ZDF or ARD than CNN (and that's not because they're German stations, either :)).
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-04 03:10 pm (UTC)I wonder what sort of medal and raise Chertoff will get later this year..
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-04 03:43 pm (UTC)Outside of that... I'm not sure what to say really. I don't watch CNN etc., so I can't compare the whole thing, but the overall impression the reports give is that the whole thing's quite a disaster indeed - and I'm not just referring to the hurricane itself. They (that is, the ZDF etc.) don't judge anything themselves, of course, but the facts reported seem to make it quite clear that the critics are right - there's not enough that's being done, not in the slightest, and it certainly seems that Dubya is (was) more interested in putting up a nice show for the propaganda machine than anything else, too.
Which is a shame. Or, as Dan Gillmor put it, it would if shame was a meaningful concept to the people at the top of the pyramid. (On a side note, Dan Gillmor's blog is syndicated on LJ as
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-04 11:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-04 12:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-04 02:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-04 03:33 pm (UTC)Was tacking this line onto the end of the report really necessary? The story looks like it stands well enough on its own without the pot-shot at the President. That last line taints the rest of the article and draws into question its objectivity.
Staged photo ops are nothing new. President Clinton was seen laughing as he exited a funeral, then when he noticed the TV cameras, he suddenly started crying. During the 2000 presidential campaign in the middle of a national drought, Al Gore had a reservoir filled up so he could paddle a canoe across it. The recent photo of Al Sharpton kneeling in prayer at the Bush's Texas ranch was a cropped photo. All those people in the background are reporters and photographers. There were more press people there than actual protesters. In this media-driven age, actions like these will be continued by all sides. The only defense is healthy skepticism.
The "problem", if you can call it that, with President Bush is that he knows the big underlying truth. Even if he did everything that all his critics said he should have or could have done with regards to Katrina, they'd still find something to blame him for. There is absolutely nothing he can do in any situation which will please his political opponents - not now, not ever - and he knows it. So he just ignores them and continues doing what he believes is the right thing. He doesn't care what the Congressional Democrats think. He isn't influenced by Gallup or Zogby or Washington Post editorials. He makes up his mind and sticks with it, be it right or wrong.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-04 04:17 pm (UTC)Al Gore did get burned for that photo op, or at least he did with me. I'd hope that outrage about pulling needed resources away to stage a photo op would have an effect on future brainless photo ops, but I doubt it.
That DHS, FEMA or the CoE would allow those needed resources to be used so frivilously - now or in the past - is the real problem.
President Bush is working against the inertia of the rescue now to have any effect - at this point whatever he does will take days to trickle down to the streets. That's just the reality of the size of the operation.
speaking up
Date: 2005-09-04 05:20 pm (UTC)Now I see this sort of happening again the Governor of the state and the polititians of the state not doing their job and passing the blame buck to the federal Government. Heck it is Cat 5 Hurricane there is no reason why you cannot mobilize forces to come in before the hurricane not waiting till afterwards. Simply it is that we still have not learned from Hurricane Andrew.
Re: speaking up
Date: 2005-09-04 10:37 pm (UTC)And much I as don't like President Bush, I don't think the screw ups on the relief efforts are his fault.
Re: speaking up
Date: 2005-09-04 11:14 pm (UTC)Re: speaking up
Date: 2005-09-05 09:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-04 04:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-04 10:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-05 11:24 am (UTC)