ext_80128 ([identity profile] ysengrin.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] ysengrin 2007-07-30 03:00 am (UTC)

Actually, I've found that the CC companies are usually very careful to mail you *notice* of changes - and if you inform them you disagree with the changes, they cut off your line of credit and allow the outstanding balance to be paid off under the old terms. I suspect you also get on a list of folks that have refused changes :)

There was a case a few years back where formula one racers were signing a waiver of liability when they accepted tires from a particular company ... after one died due to tire failure, his heirs successfully sued the company on the grounds that the waiver was improper. As far as I know it's still winding through appeals, and I don't remember the specific arguments. I'd guess that the modification without notification clause is in a similar limbo right now. If that holds up, I'd guess that the valid contract would be the last one both parties agreed to, less that one clause. I don't remember seeing any contracts in the last few years without a severability clause.

If there's no copy of an older contract, I'd think it would be difficult to use it as the basis for anything. Not impossible, just difficult.

I'm not a lawyer, and those are indeed just guesses :)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting